Here's what a compliance officer, board member, or securities counsel is likely to ask before signing off. No spin — just the mechanism.
What if the AI gives investment advice or makes a forward-looking statement? +
It can't — not as a configuration choice, as a hard restriction. Bridge is explicitly barred from discussing valuation, price targets, buy/sell/hold positions, or future production, revenue, or timeline figures. It relays only what's in your approved briefing — nothing it generates on its own.
What if it says something about our company that isn't accurate? +
Bridge doesn't generate company-specific claims — it relays them. Every fact it can state traces back to your approved briefing and document catalog. If a caller asks something outside that scope, it says so and logs the question for your team instead of guessing.
Is it even legal to record these calls? +
Every call opens with a clear, recorded notice that the conversation may be recorded and transcribed. The notice is built to match one-party or two-party consent requirements depending on where your callers are dialing from. You'll still want your own counsel to confirm this fits your specific footprint — but the mechanism is already built in, not bolted on after the fact.
Who can actually see our call recordings and transcripts? +
Your authorized IR team, and Blackcomb staff strictly for the purpose of operating and supporting your account. Recordings and transcripts are stored encrypted. They're never sold, never shared with unrelated third parties, and never used to train anything outside your account.
What happens the moment material news drops and the script is suddenly stale? +
Send us the update — script revisions are turned around quickly. And if you need coverage paused while a revision is in progress, you can redirect Bridge back to your own line at any time, for any reason, without waiting on us.
Could a securities regulator take issue with an AI answering investor calls? +
There's no rule against accurately relaying pre-approved, board-reviewed information by phone, regardless of who or what is speaking it. The real compliance exposure has never been "a machine answered" — it's "someone said something inaccurate or improvised." Bridge exists specifically to remove the improvisation, not introduce a new kind of risk.
If something does go wrong on a call, who's actually liable — you or us? +
You approve every word of the script before it ever reaches a caller, which means responsibility for content sits exactly where it already does — with the company and its disclosure controls. Bridge is the delivery mechanism, not the source of the claims, and that division is spelled out in our agreement, not left for someone to assume later.